At present, the governance forum does not have a specific topic or dedicated space explicitly intended for community feedback. As a result, input from the community is often scattered across different threads, making it difficult to collect, review, and follow up on in a systematic way.
Providing a clear feedback topic or category would help the community share their perspectives, constructive criticism, and improvement suggestions in a more structured manner. It would also make it easier for the governance side to identify patterns, set priorities, and improve the overall quality of decision making.
So if u have any feedback feel free to discuss in here
First, I suggest creating a dedicated Discord role and community space specifically for DAO members or governance participants. This space can be focused on policy discussions, governance coordination, and faster, more contextual communication compared to forums or general social media channels.
Second, I see the need for a more scheduled and consistent governance mechanism, such as holding regular governance calls—either biweekly or monthly. This is important so governance discussions do not rely solely on one-way updates through Twitter Lisk DAO, but instead create direct dialogue between the team, council, and the community. These calls can also help attract and involve more contributors and stakeholders in the governance process.
Third (experimental approach), to attract more builders, Lisk could introduce a mission based request framework, such as Mission Requests or Lisk Foundation Missions (LPM). Builders who deliver real value and actively contribute to Lisk should be rewarded in a measurable and transparent way, enabling the ecosystem to grow sustainably and competitively.
Fourth, regarding feedback and transparency, I believe it is important to clearly explain how the ES Council makes decisions—especially in the evaluation process and calculation of each LSK token allocation given to builders as rewards.
For example:
Project A delivers impact to Lisk, but the reward given is not measurable or appears excessive.
Project B does not provide sufficient impact and the proposal is rejected — the project or application should receive clear reasoning explaining why it was rejected.
Fifth, I propose creating a trust tier system (Tier 1, 2, 3, 4) for projects.
Projects with a strong track record—such as those that have previously received Lisk funding—could be classified as Tier 1, making them eligible to receive funding of up to 100,000 LSK, with lower tiers having different funding limits and requirements.
We don’t have a DAO at the moment, because all the power is concentrated in the hands of three people (the team). At present, all three of them together hold 21.73 million votes(and of course some people whom they delegate will vote like they want too). At the same time, Max initially took a pause and accumulated 14 million voting power, and as a result this figure has approached 30 million (this is about the potential).
At this point, I don’t see any sense in deciding anything — nothing is being heard by the team. They want to make all the decisions themselves — well, let them make them.
Denial of token burn while 99.9% community voted yes for me was the end of this project. Unfortunately I lost a lot of money selling at 0.41 cents but I’m glad that I did that - better late than never. I strongly believe that this project is dead and I see no point of discussing anything here as even with adoption lisk technology is outdated and not worthy of being in global usage. Leave lisk to African’s poorest regions I guess.
That is only my personal opinion after being with lisk since 2018. I saw only degradation for 7 years straight. I’m sorry to say but 2026 will be no different.
P.s. : I was banned here for saying truth about project as I’m one of the few people here who know this project history very well.
Lisk team is banning everyone here and on discord who have any negative opinion about project (this is the main reason why community feedback is hard to collect) so I think that this topic should be closed. They killed their last members of their own community in 2025.
