Counterargument Proposal: Lisk Should Invest Excess Tokens into an Ecosystem Fund

Discussions
2
  1. 45M LISK has already been minted for the DAO fund (!!!)
  2. I’ll ask just one question: Why was the Lisk Foundation renamed to Onchain Foundation, and why does Onchain Foundation not want to cover all expenses related to the Lisk ecosystem?
  3. Onchain Foundation and the team have already “robbed” their holders of 50%, and now they want more? Is it not enough?
  4. Read this: If the team doesn’t plan to increase the price, then burn it. If they do plan to increase it, then my variant is the best one, or again the team is lying and showing deceit. IMHO

Update: To be honest, over time I’ve come to agree that maybe we should keep the tokens, but only with my variant. This will motivate the team to create the best product, and investors will not sell tokens because the team will have strong motivation. There are many other advantages as well.
Update 2: If the first vote is to keep or burn, I will vote to burn. If the first vote is to keep it with a lock by price or burn, I will vote to keep.

1 Like