Break the Token Burn decision into yearly votes

[grumlin]

@SuperchainEco

We’ve heard from multiple stakeholders in this forum thread and through various conversations, and believe this alternative approach is the right step forward for LiskDAO.

We propose submitting this alternative path for a vote on Tally next week and rolling out the logic as described in the proposal if it is accepted.

If not accepted by vpLSK holders, we can continue the conversation around the binary token burn vote as previously discussed.

We would love for stakeholders, including the larger vpLSK holders, to share their reflection and stance toward this proposal ahead of a prospective DAO vote.

Will vote against it

To be honest, I’m currently planning to transform my prev proposal(100M DAO Tokens Locking Based on Price Milestones) into something that could serve as a compromise for everyone.

For example:

• Burn 50 million tokens right away
• Lock the remaining 50 million based on my idea
• Keep the first 5 unlock stages with price targets from $7.5 to $17.5