My argument is simple: 15 million tokens were minted for the first case, and 3 million for the second. I suggested distributing them as LayerZero has done, which is fair.
However, you propose repeating the approach used during the migration—using participants’ funds to “benefit” the participants themselves. During the migration, you focused on expansion, which is good, but it was done at the expense of the holders, diluting their shares, which is not fair. Despite the changing market conditions, it did not allow you to mint new tokens. For example, Ethereum didn’t mint any tokens despite being in the same conditions. Moreover, the fund still holds ~100mln $.
That’s why I believe it’s fair to reward the active community. Especially since I’m not asking for new tokens to be allocated from the DAO but simply to redistribute the tokens that were minted for this exact purpose.