As a discussion about boosting/pausing happened already on Discord, I wanted to link to
-
my explanantion why the current implementation is like this, and
-
some argument why I don’t see a big risk in the current implementation.
Also, I could imagine that a discussion about boosting/pausing could take quite some time. Especially when the outcome of the discussion will be to make changes to the system. Most of all, if the decision goes into the direction The boost should be automatic
as this is quite complex. To make the approval of the first constitution not timely depended on this discussion, we could do the following:
-
Remove the specification of the voting power computation from the first version of the constitution. Specifically, remove the sections
Voting power calculation
andBoosting the voting power
. -
Move the discussion about boosting/pausing to a separate thread.
-
Once the discussion about boosting/pausing settled, amend the constitution.